Welcome!
While we took a quarter hiatus from this newsletter to complete my graduate program at Georgetown, the world has changed, literally, in a matter of six months.
As baby boomer musical icon Jerry Garcia was known to proclaim, “What a long, strange (and troubling) trip it has been.”
Fortunately, there are now early indicators of having avoided a catastrophe and that a recovery is slowly seeding. Despite our perilous dance with implosion, how much is really changing? Are we willing to heed the call to a new consciousness - one in which we collectively evolve to new notions of responsibility? Or will we take what first appears to be the easier path back to old habits of materialism over humanism, consumption over conservation, depletion over re-generation - financed by perpetual over-extension of personal and natural resources? As the President and most of the world’s economic experts have asserted, it’s a model that is inherently unsustainable.
Those of us who take pride in our work as strategic thinkers, and leaders, must muster the courage to pose the hard questions as a measure against our own actions and the actions of those we work with and serve: To what extent is American business and its acts of commerce obligated to responsible behavior in the interest of civil society? Should business entities align their behavior to a pre-determined moral code of fair play for profit that is beyond the established legal framework? What or who determines any code of behavior on moral or ethical grounds?
Many assert that the current crisis is a capitulation of the old order to a new paradigm; that we are approaching a definition for what constitutes the “public interest” for this time, and what it entails for business going forward. Organizations that participate in multi-national activities suggest that the threat to civil society and global stability - from the conditions in emerging democracies and third-world communities - is accelerating American’s sense of urgency for responsibility. Still others attest to an evolutionary consciousness in the developed world that is directing us to a new consensus for, and collective expectation of, responsibility across society and culture.
What’s clear is that a renewed emphasis on competence, authenticity, and responsibility is taking hold that is requiring organizations of all stripes to reshape their business models and practices.
Meanwhile, the downturn has Americans altering their attitudes and behaviors. The 2009 annual trends report from the Natural Marketing Institute cites the overarching theme for 2009 is “Recalibration.” The report also outlined ten emerging macro trends in consumer behavior:
- Big changes through small steps
- Isolation to Affiliation
- Exploring, experiencing, learning
- Personal and planetary health combine
- Detoxification
- From alternative to mainstream
- Going deeper
- Authentic Aesthetics
- Energy Consciousness
- Quality over Quantity
Blinded, Once Again, by the Blight
In some business circles, the validity of sustainability as a business imperative has been debated with suspicion as a ‘west coast’ thing that at best, in the current economic climate, invites a look at ways to reduce energy consumption. Any correlation between sustainable, socially-responsible business practices to strategies for growing out of the recession has, at times, been dismissed outright.
We should not let those purveyors of such contrarian thinking off the hook so easily. Such a headstrong resistance to greater consciousness is in fact symptomatic of the very state that contributed to us getting into this mess in the first place. One may legitimately assert that a lack of vigorous questioning of the entrenched assumptions of the status quo is itself an act of irresponsibility warranting its own scrutiny. We need not look any further to gauge the danger of prolonged unconsciousness than its ominous impact on the budget deficit and future GDP - if we fail to enact viable new energy and healthcare policies.
These are not issues of personal politics, party affiliation, or ideology. They are, however, an awakening to what constitutes conscious leadership and its attendant aligned behavior that is the very essence of smart business for a 21st century economy. Conscious leadership is all about embracing sustainability as a means to developing new revenue and profitability streams, ensuring long-term competitiveness, and improving stakeholder value.
Did I mention smart (for) business?
Responsibility is Now Smart Business
Regardless of whether some leaders fail to acknowledge the extent to which the game has been permanently changed, it all comes down to smart business. We have evolved from a shareholder society to a stakeholder-driven society in which relying on the boardroom or C-suite perspective as the sole architecture for an organization’s competitive strategy has been trumped by the volatile and increasingly impactful force of stakeholder priorities.
The historical pattern for organization leaders has been to focus on reputational, resource, and regulatory risks as the context for business sustainability; one in which business could flourish fairly detached from proactive adherence to public interest values. That pattern has run its course.
|
“What’s clear is that a renewed emphasis on competence, authenticity, and responsibility is taking hold that is requiring organizations of all stripes to reshape their business models and practices.” |
|
|
If there is any single lesson to be learned from our current challenges, it is that our culture has been dominated by prevailing individualism at the expense of the interdependent common good. Ask any non-American what they perceive as the virtues and shortcomings of our economic culture; you’ll often hear that we treat individualism and common good as if the two are mutually exclusive, rather than as one - each vitally dependent upon the other. This recession’s historic and indiscriminate ‘take down’ across our financial infrastructure could not be more conclusive: Business and society must evolve from moving along parallel tracks to fuller integration on one interdependent track that aggregates business, stakeholder, and public interests into initiatives of shared obligation and mutual reward.
Organization leaders have nothing to be nervous about. The ‘public interest’ encompasses a broad range of issues that smart leaders need to filter into their business decisions and enterprise development strategies. And they are all critical to the continuity, growth, and sustainability of the business as well as its stakeholder communities.
What leaders do need to be concerned with in the nearer term, however, is the damage done to the reputation and credibility of American business from being viewed worldwide as the perpetrator of practices that led to the financial meltdown. At the World Economic Forum in February, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon emphasized that the key for business and industry is credibility. While few trust business now, Ban Ki-moon notes the irony that two-thirds of the world’s people “think business should be fully engaged in tackling our common problems.” Business leaders may have their work cut out for them: A number of recent polls, including the Edelman Trust Barometer, indicate only a third of people in the world trust business to do the right thing. “Half what it used to be,” stressed Ban Ki-moon.
What is so dramatically changing? Here’s a snapshot: |